Sorry, you need to enable JavaScript to visit this website.

The new space race: Jeff Bezos v Elon Musk

Rocket Men

The rivalry between two billionaires is reducing the cost of space travel. Tom Standage climbs into the cockpit

The rivalry between two billionaires is reducing the cost of space travel. Tom Standage climbs into the cockpit

Tom Standage | June/July 2016

Skyscrapers and giant yachts are so passé. These days a tech billionaire who wants to assert his wealth, power and, er, manhood needs a rocket to play with – and the bigger the better. Two billionaires in particular have been tussling lately over who has the more impressive equipment: Jeff Bezos (above), the boss of Amazon, and Elon Musk (below), the boss of SpaceX and Tesla. As childish as their public sparring appears, the consequences are tangible – and deserve to be widely celebrated.

Bezos made his fortune through Amazon, the retailer whose spookily accurate algorithms know what you will buy next even before you do, and whose cloud-computing systems quietly power much of the internet. With his vast but hidden power and characteristic laugh, it’s surely only a matter of time before Bezos is used as the model for a Bond villain. In his spare time he has been playing with his rocket on his ranch in Texas – a ranch so big that it includes a spaceport. He is also building a giant, indestructible clock inside a nearby mountain that will chime once a millennium (it’s supposed to encourage long-term thinking).

Musk, meanwhile, became wealthy by co-founding PayPal, and ploughing the proceeds into Tesla, which makes ridiculously fast electric cars (they actually have a “Ludicrous” setting that enables them to do 0-60mph in 2.8 seconds), and SpaceX, a rocket company. Musk appears to be the successor to Steve Jobs – the innovator even non-techies have heard of. But Jobs did not crash supercars and fly fighter jets in his spare time, or casually propose a design for a supersonic tube-railway on stilts (which several companies are now trying to build). For the past year, however, Musk has been preoccupied with landing a rocket on a giant, autonomous sea-going barge. After four failed attempts, each of which ended in “rapid unscheduled disassembly”, which is rocket-speak for a “large explosion”, he finally pulled it off in April. In a tweet last year Musk promised that, once he got it to work, “I’m treating myself to a volcanic lair.”

Which brings us to the specific nature of the two men’s rivalry. When it comes to rockets, the hard part is not getting it up – quite the opposite, in fact. Bezos and Musk are pushing the frontiers in reusable rockets, in which the booster section at the bottom returns to Earth after lift off, rather than being discarded in the sea. Rockets are expensive, so throwing them away like that is, if you think about, bonkers: Musk compares it to building a new 747 every time you want to cross the Atlantic. In December last year his company successfully landed the first stage of one of its Falcon 9 rockets on a landing pad in Florida, after it had launched a handful of satellites into orbit. But this triumph was undercut by the fact that just a few days earlier Bezos’s rocket company, Blue Origin, had flown its own unmanned rocket to the edge of space and then landed it back on the launch pad.

Bezos joined Twitter, which he had previously shunned but where Musk has a huge following, in order to announce his triumph with his first tweet. Much passive-aggressive tweeting followed, as the two men outwardly congratulated each other on their accomplishments, while quietly insisting on the superiority of their own rockets. Yes, Bezos may have landed his rocket first, but Musk’s is much bigger and can carry payloads into orbit. Then again, Bezos re-flew his rocket, proving that it was genuinely reusable. That put the ball back in Musk’s court. Which is why he’s so pleased to have pulled off a sea landing of a rocket on one of those giant barges. Next he plans to demonstrate his new, even bigger rocket. Top that, Jeff.

Why should anyone care about this posturing? Because in their one-upmanship, the duelling billionaires are bringing down the cost of access to space. A Falcon 9 rocket costs about $60m, and the booster section at the bottom, called the first stage, accounts for about 70% of that sum. Recovering the first stage and reusing it, say, nine times could therefore cut the cost of a launch by two-thirds. Landing rockets on sea-going platforms helps too: you can devote more fuel to launching heavier payloads if you don’t have to fly all the way back to a terrestrial launch pad afterwards.

Bezos is eyeing the space-tourism market. Musk’s rockets already carry cargo to the International Space Station and launch commercial satellites, but he is looking beyond that to his real goal: the colonisation of Mars, a crazy-sounding plan that he has been going on about for more than a decade. “I want to die on Mars,” he likes to say, “just not on impact.” He believes a Mars colony is a vital insurance policy for mankind, which might otherwise be wiped out by an asteroid, nuclear war or malevolent killer robots. His new Falcon Heavy rocket is due to make its first flight this autumn, and he says he will unveil the plans for a ship called the Mars Colony Transporter in September.

Even if he doesn’t get to the red planet (though my bet is that he will), Musk is advancing rocket technology at unprecedented speed, repeatedly doing things that were previously thought to be impossible. If his rivalry with Bezos accelerates the process, so much the better. If rich men want to compete to make space travel cheaper, that’s great. It’s a productive and useful form of egotism, unlike building skyscrapers or acquiring yachts. And you don’t need to be a rocket scientist to appreciate that.

4 Readers' comments

Sign in or Create your account to join the discussion.

grunderson - April 4th 2017

There's nothing childish about competition, it's fundamental to any sort of advancement or greater human drive. It sure doesn't sound nice however, but it's true as history as proven endlessly. The only thing childish is the naivety of disparaging competition, I mean were you born yesterday? And people should care about this in terms of their daily lives, as I'm sure they enjoy GPS or any sort of satellite service. Also I'm sure most people don't want their descendants to all be wiped out by that next 1km with Earth's name on it (will turn the entire surface into molten rock). The only way to prevent humanity's extinction is living on more than one rock at one time.

HegelBagels - April 3rd 2017

@essentials Oh get over yourself. The space race has always had a hint of childish competition behind it. Instead of a geopolitical pissing match between states we now have individuals vying for their spot in the annals of history. And to deny that their isn't something phallic going on in the pursuit of space travel is kinda ridiculous, it's not to say that Musk or Bezos are interested in this for the sole point of affirming some notion of manhood but that, on some level, this competitive pursuit (which can be reductively thought of as building space dicks to penetrate our solar system) has some phallic posturing vibes inherent in it. Who is stupid enough to think of space travel as something so important that a lighthearted quip ruins their ability to engage with an article? This space travel and colonization bullshit is immaterial in terms of its benefits to most people and we should probably be critical about placing so much value around it. It's not ridiculous to think that creating sustainable life elsewhere could make it easy to forget about the hole we've dug on Earth that many people will not be able to escape from.

daemonbarber - April 3rd 2017

Of course Bezos was able to relaunch his rocket first. It's a sub orbital rocket. We've been reusing sub orbital rockets for years, they're called model rockets. This one might be bigger, but it's still small and slow compared to SpaceX. Any reporting that tries to put Bezos' rocket in the same league as SpaceX is distorting truth to create a story where there isn't one. Blue Origin has to travel 100km straight up. SpaceX has to reach 7-9 km/s.

Essentials - April 3rd 2017

"As childish as their public sparring appears" Childish? Since when has this ever been childish? Who is stupid enough to think the multi-trillion dollar industry of space privatization is childish? Who is moronic enough to think this has anything to do with their manhood? This article may have a solid point but I couldn't make it past your first paragraph. Chewing through the idiotic introduction cost me my sanity.